首页> 外文OA文献 >Productivity and profitability of strip intercropping systems as implemented by agronomists and farmers
【2h】

Productivity and profitability of strip intercropping systems as implemented by agronomists and farmers

机译:农学家和农民实施的带间作系统的生产率和获利能力

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

On-station experiments investigated whether three-crop strips produced net gains in yield and profit and examined different crop rotations in strips for profitability, border interactions, and fertilizer nitrogen requirements. The sites were the Northeast Research Station (NERC), at Nashua, Iowa, and Living History Farms (LHF), near Des Moines. A corn-soybean rotation was compared to three-year crop rotations that included a sole-seeded forage legume or a forage legume established with a small grains nurse crop;For three years, six cooperating farmers recorded yields and kept Iowa State University Crop Enterprise Records (CER) for strip intercropping and for single-crop blocks. Four compared three-crop intercropping to the same three-crop rotations in sole-crop blocks (\u22planting pattern\u22), while two producers compared three-crop strips to the corn-soybean rotation in sole-crop blocks (\u22system comparison\u22). Labor requirements were similar in strips and field blocks (planting pattern) to 22 percent less in intercropping (system comparison). Profit averaged 3.80 per acre greater (planting pattern) and 14.76 per acre greater (system comparison) in strips than field blocks. There was a tendency for risk reduction in strip intercropping;Three-crop rotations on the experiment stations performed comparably to corn-soybeans, although drought reduced yields. At NERC, corn at strip borders yielded more than corn in strip interiors. At LHF the reverse was true. There was no significant difference between yields at the east and west borders. Corn yields at both sites were less next to soybeans than other crops;In two site-years drought prevented significant yield response to nitrogen. Corn grain nitrogen concentration consistently responded to nitrogen fertilizer and occasionally to crop rotation. Soybean yields were reduced at strip borders. There was a tendency for lower soybean yields next to corn than other crops;Grain and straw yields of small grains were not significantly different by position. Hay harvests averaged slightly less at strip borders; however, at first hay cutting east borders yielded more than strip centers;There is a place for extended crop rotations and strip intercropping systems that incorporate them. Prerequisites include adequate management and cost-effective uses for crops in the rotation third year.
机译:现场实验调查了三茬地带是否在产量和利润方面产生了净收益,并检查了地带不同作物轮作的获利能力,边界相互作用和肥料氮需求。这些地点是爱荷华州纳舒厄的东北研究站(NERC)和得梅因附近的生活史农场(LHF)。将玉米-大豆轮作制度与三年轮作制度进行了比较,其中包括单独播种的饲草豆科植物或用小型谷物护士作物建立的饲草豆科植物;三年来,六个合作农民记录了产量并保持了爱荷华州立大学的作物企业记录(CER),用于条带间作和单条作物。四个将单一作物块中的三作物间作与相同的三个作物轮作进行了比较,而两个生产者将单一作物块中的三作物条与玉米-大豆轮作进行了比较(系统比较\ u22)。条带和田间地块(种植方式)的劳动力需求相近,而间作间的劳动力需求减少了22%(系统比较)。条状地带的平均利润要比田间地块高每英亩多3.80(种植方式),每英亩多高14.76(系统比较)。有条带间作的风险降低的趋势;尽管干旱降低了产量,但试验站的三作轮作与玉米-大豆的表现相当。在NERC,带状边界的玉米产量高于带状内部的玉米。在LHF,情况恰恰相反。东边界和西边界的产量之间没有显着差异。两个地点的玉米单产都比其他农作物少,仅次于大豆。在两个地点的年份中,干旱阻止了对氮的显着单产响应。玉米籽粒中的氮浓度始终对氮肥产生响应,偶尔对作物轮作产生响应。地带边界的大豆单产下降。玉米旁边的大豆单产比其他农作物有降低的趋势;小谷粒的谷物和稻草单产在位置上没有显着差异。地带边界的干草收成平均略低;然而,起初,干草割草东部边界的产量要高于带状作物中心;这里有一个扩大作物轮作和带状作物间作系统的地方。前提条件包括轮作第三年对作物的适当管理和具有成本效益的利用。

著录项

  • 作者

    Exner, Derrick Noble;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1997
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号